Book Plagiarism in the UK: Has it Happened to You?

by Al Siebert, Ph.D., author of
The Survivor Personality

First appeared in Publishers Marketing Association Newsletter
Volume 16, No. 2, February, 1998


Imagine yourself in this situation: You discover that a highly plagiarized version of a book you researched, wrote, and published has been published under another author's name in the United Kingdom. The author copied many passages from your book verbatim, used your same book structure, and even used your same title. Nowhere in her book are you identified as the source.

You assume at first that an unscrupulous writer slipped a plagiarized book past a lax editorial staff that did not check Bowkers Books in Print and did not ask the author for copies of her permissions to quote. But then you notice that the publisher's name seems familiar. You examine your office records and find that an acquisitions editor with this publisher ordered a review copy of your book several years before. The publisher initiated the plagiarism, not the writer!

After you calm down from feeling outraged, you realize the plagiarism is very extensive and the party with "deep pockets" is the main perpetrator. You and your associates assume you will collect a big settlement.

Given this scenario, what is your estimate of the amount of punitive damages (in dollars) you imagine you might collect in your law suit?

  1. zero
  2. $25,000 or more
  3. over $100,000
  4. over one million dollars

Brace yourself. The correct answer is zero. I was shocked to learn that British courts give awards only for actual damages. They do not award punitive damages. Even worse, if you sue for punitive damages they may order you to pay all of the defendants' legal expenses.

My case raises serious concerns for all US publishers and authors because it is a systemic problem in British publishing, not a matter of an occasional amoral writer. The British courts have created a situation where major London publishers can knock off books copyrighted in the US knowing that if they are caught their only risk is having to pay out the amount of revenue they took in. Here are the facts and critical issues:

In 1993 my publishing company, the Practical Psychology Press, published The Survivor Personality, a non-fiction, self-help book I spent over thirty years researching and developing.

In 1994 I had my book on display at the Publishers Marketing Association booth at the annual American Booksellers Association conference. Kathy Rooney, an acquisitions editor with Bloomsbury, a large London publishing house, saw my book at the PMA booth and requested a review copy. When Rooney's request was forwarded to my office by PMA, we quickly airmailed a copy to her in London.

Top | Bottom

In 1995 The Survivor Personality was acquired by Perigee, a Berkley Books imprint. The book was edited, revised slightly, and published in September, 1996.

Berkley sold the UK rights to The Survivor Personality to Thorsons, a London publisher. A few weeks later we received a request from Thorsons asking if they could retitle the book How Thrive and Survive in Any Life Crisis. The editor said they discovered there was already a UK book titled The Survivor Personality, authored by Patsy Westcott, and wanted to avoid confusion.

A friend in London bought and mailed a copy of Westcott's book to me. As I stood in the post office looking through it I felt angry and distressed seeing page after page of my original work copied verbatim. She used my same book structure and even copied quotes from people I had interviewed. Although she quoted other experts, I was not acknowledged anywhere.

The book was copyrighted in Patsy Westcott's name in 1995. Under the copyright notice I saw the statement "The moral right of the author has been asserted." Later I learned that such a statement goes beyond copyrighting a particular written work. It is a declaration that the author is the originator of the concepts and ideas the written work is based on. Westcott not only plagiarized my book, she claimed to be the originator of concepts I created and researched.

When I contacted the Berkley legal department one of their attorneys, Gina Anderson, gave me some very good news. She said that when they acquired the rights to my book they also assumed the obligation to defend their rights. Hooray! The case will be handled by a New York publisher's legal department at no expense to me.

Top | Bottom

Gina Anderson sent a demand letter to Bloomsbury in January, 1997. In her letter she said Westcott's book "is one of the most flagrant and extensive cases of plagiarism, copyright infringement, passing off and violation of an author's more rights that we have ever seen. Most disturbing, there is powerful evidence that the taking was intentional and that in addition to Patsy Westcott, Bloomsbury played an active role in the taking."

The Bloomsbury attorney responded immediately. He acknowledged that Westcott's book was plagiarized from mine, but claimed it wasn't Bloomsbury's fault. He said Kathy Rooney liked the idea of my book, but felt it was "too American for British readers." He said Rooney contacted Patsy Westcott, a London based writer in the self-help/psychology field who had done a previous book for Bloomsbury. He said Rooney gave Westcott my book and "commissioned her to do a book of a similar nature for the British market."

The Bloomsbury attorney said that when Westcott turned in the completed manuscript Rooney was on maternity leave. He said the Bloomsbury editors who took her place did not know about my book and had no reason to suspect that the manuscript turned in by Westcott was based on my book.

He said "our clients relied not only on the experience of the author, but also on the fact that the author would have been aware under the terms of her warranty that she was obliged to produce a work that was in no way whatever a violation or infringement of any existing copyright."

In other words, the spin on the plagiarism by Bloomsbury attorney was that the plagiarism had resulted from several innocent mistakes, mostly the author's fault, not from intentional actions. He also would have us believe that when Kathy Rooney returned from maternity leave she never looked at the book to see how it turned out.

Westcott never responded to the demand letters Berkley sent to her. According to the Bloomsbury attorney, Patsy Westcott's attorneys told him that Westcott believed Bloomsbury had acquired the rights to my book and the editor wanted her to rewrite the book as her own original work.

Anderson was delighted to have a written admission of guilt from the Bloomsbury attorney. She told me over and over that if the case went to court we would only have to prove damages.

Bloomsbury immediately recalled all the unsold Westcott books and ordered them destroyed. The Berkley attorney requested a settlement offer and told me it should be negotiated quickly.

Bloomsbury's attorney reported that Bloomsbury sold about 2200 copies of Westcott's book for a gross income of 5,925 pounds sterling. He offered settlement for actual damages of 5000 pounds (about $7,500). This was much lower than what Anderson said we should get and was unacceptable to me.

The negotiations drug out for four months. Bloomsbury's final settlement was 6000 pounds. I told Anderson that this amount was unsatisfactory. The plagiarism was extreme and had been initiated by the publisher, not the author. I said that if she could not get a better offer I wanted her to file a lawsuit.

Top | Bottom

It was then that I got another shock. Anderson informed me that Berkley would not sue Bloomsbury because they had an ongoing professional relationship. They sold books to Bloomsbury and vice versa. She said she was not going to sour their relationship with a lawsuit. After four months of her telling me "if we go to court...," I now learn that Berkley will not go to court.

Because I would not agree to accept the 6000 pounds settlement, Anderson detached Berkley from the case. She said she had protected Berkley's interests because the Westcott book was recalled and destroyed. She said if I wanted to sue Bloomsbury, I would have to proceed on my own.

I retained a private attorney in London and said I wanted to file a lawsuit for a very high amount for punitive damages. After looking at the facts of my case my London barrister said I should accept Bloomsbury's settlement offer. She explained that British courts rarely award punitive damages and actively discourage such suits by requiring the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs if what they award is even one pound less than the settlement offer.

In my case, she said, I would certainly be awarded actual damages of an amount equal to what Bloomsbury took in from book sales (5925 pounds). But if the court accepted the explanation given by Bloomsbury's attorney that this was merely a matter of several mistakes, and I had turned down their offer to settle for 6000 pounds, I would have to reimburse Bloomsbury and Westcott all of their legal costs! A law suit, even though successful, would place me at serious risk of having to pay out thousands of pounds more than my award. When presented with this reality, I decided to let prudence prevail over principle.

My London attorney negotiated a settlement slightly higher than what had been offered. She also succeeded in getting Bloomsbury to publish an apology to me in The Bookseller, the British equivalent of Publisher's Weekly. Their published apology (I approved in advance) included the statement "Ms. Westcott and Bloomsbury deeply regret that Dr. Siebert was not acknowledged in the book and take this opportunity to acknowledge Dr. Siebert's work, copyright, and moral rights in his book The Survivor Personality." (July 4th, 1997, page 73).

Top | Bottom

About this time a local physician told me he had an experience similar to mine. Derek Lipman, an ear/nose/throat specialist, said he wrote a book about how to stop snoring in 1990. In 1995 he discovered that a plagiarized version of his book had been published by Harper-Collins in London in 1992.

Lipman showed me copies of the author's response to the charge of plagiarism. The author, Liz Hodgkinson, admitted that she had a copy of Lipman's book when she was writing hers. She said "it contained useful information of a factual nature which Dr. Lipman had assembled from existing research and material: it did not originate from him, but was in the public domain." Her position, in other words, is that whatever physicians learn in their medical training is in the public domain, and since a book a doctor writes about a subject is public domain information, it can be used by any writer wanting to cover the same subject without attribution to the doctor.

Hodgkinson claimed she had conducted extensive interviews of snoring experts in Britain and that their two books were alike because "there is nothing else to say on the subject, so of course they are similar."

Lipman contacted seventeen of the most well known medical specialists on snoring in England. None of them said they had been interviewed by Hodgkinson. Only one recalled a woman interviewer telephoning to ask several questions.

Harper-Collins withdrew their snoring book from distribution and reimbursed Lipman his legal costs while stating "We strongly deny that any passages of Ms. Hodgkinson's book have been directly reproduced, or paraphrased, or that the format and substance of (Lipman's) work has been followed or copied."

These cases raise many questions:

  • If two authors living in Portland, Oregon, have had plagiarized versions of their books published by major British publishing houses in recent years, how extensive is this activity in Britain?
  • What can we do to find out how many books by US authors have been plagiarized in the UK?
  • How many PMA members have sent books to UK publishers to consider for acquisition? How can small, independent publishers keep track of what happens to our books in the UK?
  • Has this happened to any other PMA members? Has anyone had a book plagiarized?
  • How can US book publishers and authors protect themselves when British courts make book plagiarism in the UK a low risk activity?

Return to top

(check back soon for search)